I think it was Siemsen's bench that persuaded me too. The LV design had
the two slabs placed further apart, like a dust well. I didn't want
that. I've used the centre gap for lateral planing support a few times,
and it's quite convenient. My slabs are joined by on-parallel
cross-bearers screwed below, but the top is held on dowel pins entirely
by gravity. With the Record vise attached, it's wicked heavy. By my
calculations, the beefier Doug Fir base came in just slightly heavier
than the maple that the LV plans called for, and I think it looks more
substantial. I've seen no loosening of the butt joints, nor any racking
whatsoever.
Don
On 2021-08-01 3:32 p.m., Adam R. Maxwell via groups.io wrote:
> Split top is another thing I have no regrets on, and I think I stole that idea
from Mike Siemsen. I've had to tighten the deck screws on the base up a few
times, but it's still solid, even with no glued joints.
--
“What we are seeing is a decision by the government to get as many people
infected as possible, as quickly as possible,
while using rhetoric about caution as a way of putting the blame on the public
for the consequences...”
- Prof Robert West, health psychologist, University College, London
"extremist individualism … an ideology that claims to be about freedom when
really it means selfishness”.
|